2026

Highlight report HR-06 · 19–23 October 2026

In short: The archive answers each question: police occurrence books end in 1984 and station logs in 1979; the 1988 Weekly Orders exist but are closed because they name serving officers, and a paid search can be commissioned; no press-office files ar

In short: The firm states the matter was an old file from its London office, closed in 1996, and that no records remain in storage.

In short: The records team lists five metadata records and digital resources on Great House Farm/Tŷ Mawr and describes the catalogue and library searches undertaken.

In short: Defra states that the 1936–1955 farm records requested are not held after a search of paper and electronic records, and that the information may be held by the Welsh Government.

In short: Confirms that the decision not to investigate further is final.

In short: The records team states no information is held under EIR 12(4)(a) but identifies microfiche archaeological reports transferred to RCAHMW on 12 January 2018 and provides a Coflein link.

The statutory deadline passed with no reply (ref 00211463).

In short: Provides a disclosure letter addressing retention schedules and searches, indicating some information may not be specifically recorded.

In short: Provides an attached response letter concerning Welsh Office/Cadw papers for Great House Farm following the earlier related request.

In short: Describes the search methodology used, confirms predecessor accession registers were included, and states no further search log exists.

In short: The HER team answers a 48-item schedule, citing public availability or 'not held' for most items and withholding change-log data as personal information.

In short: The HER team confirms digitisation of the source file onto Archwilio and states a physical search found no further information held.

In short: The registrar states no death record or burial/cremation record was found locally and gives a reference for ordering a certificate elsewhere.

In short: States Cardiff does not hold the death registration, cites an index reference, and suggests obtaining a certificate from head office.

In short: States no separate record exists documenting why certain findings were excluded from FOI 2026-024's scope, and confirms nothing withheld.

In short: States no separate exclusion schedule exists, reclassifies MS 3360/3 as unrelated to the Llandough property, and maintains prior position on Ref 13.2.

In short: The clerk refuses the request under section 12, citing an estimated 37 hours to review 14 years of minutes, and suggests narrowing the date range.

In short: A liaison officer sends the outcome of an internal review regarding an earlier Freedom of Information Act request.

In short: Planning and Environment Decisions Wales confirms it holds no records for the property or the named planning applications.

In short: The FOI officer states no further recorded information identifying Great House Farm exists within MS 3360/3 beyond what was disclosed.

In short: The FOI officer states no filtered schedule is held but supplies parish, acreage, and tenant details from MS 3360/3 and confirms Ref 13.2's description.

In short: States searches across registered files and the NMRW archive were extensive, confirms no further records, and offers a scan order with associated charges noted.

In short: The records team discloses further material, including a waterwheel record and an estate sale document page, from additional searches.

In short: States no 1877 deed is held, provides D696 catalogue links, suggests a Bute Estate item, and points to National Archives maps.

In short: States South Wales Police does not hold information relating to named individuals requested.

In short: States no letters or records on the site exist in registered files, cites archive catalogue entries, and quotes a historic-environment description.

In short: States position is unchanged, no further records located, and further enquiries on this property will not be answered.

In short: The FOI officer states no recorded cross-attribution links the two Llandough farms and no separate record explains the earlier 'unrelated' conclusion.

In short: States a petition is not held, offers a paid record search, and redirects scheduling and planning-file questions to other bodies.

In short: Provides catalogue results and some court case records, states most material is not expected to be held, and offers paid research for further searches.

In short: Internal review upholds the original location-based search methodology for FOI 2026-024 as reasonable and proportionate.

In short: Discloses records on other archaeological discoveries at Great House Farm and Church Farm, redacting third-party personal data under s.40(2).

In short: States the Wales Office does not hold the requested records and suggests contacting the Welsh Government for transferred files.

In short: The council chair states the clerk already provided all available information and there is nothing more to add.

In short: Concludes member conduct issue outside complaints policy, declines to adjudicate land ownership, confirms checking records on tree removal.

In short: Forwards a response from HM Land Registry's Chief Executive and states a Ministry of Justice reply is still awaited.

In short: Reiterates no records relating to the property or requester were located and cannot confirm whether any records once existed.

In short: Supplies a 1965 land conveyance and purchase price, states no record found indicating a below-market or gifted transfer.

In short: Provides a corrected catalogue description and full transcription of a 1877 lease, confirming no mention of the other locality, and offers a plan copy.

In short: Confirms the second entry is still not held locally, declines to comment on individual case details, and redirects to GRO head office.

In short: Confirms holding of one death entry with purchase options, states the second requested death entry cannot be located.

In short: Internal review upholds the original decision that no further records on furniture or movable property from Great House Farm are held.

In short: Provides details on a named deed, confirms no further deeds or quarrying records, and redirects to other bodies for additional material.

In short: The FOI officer reaffirms that all held information has been provided and directs the requester to the Welsh Government complaints process.

In short: Subject-access response (held privately; content not published).

In short: States no records relating to the property or requester were located, citing 1980s demolition and standard retention periods.

In short: The FOI officer confirms no further records are held, explains historic and current retention policy, and redirects HER queries to Heneb.

In short: The archive assistant reports no documents located prior to 1955, noting BP acquired the property only in the 1960s.

In short: The FOI officer states no records of the visor, lance, or related discovery are held, aside from unrelated archaeological finds.

In short: Monitoring Officer explains the assessment process and states no evidence of a Code of Conduct breach was disclosed.

In short: States register holdings for two parishes are limited, offers a searchable Llandough register, visit details, and paid research service.

In short: The records team confirms no surviving records, finding aids, or destruction registers were located, citing general retention and destruction procedures.

In short: The Medical Examiner Service states it holds no records this far back and suggests contacting the local registrars office.

In short: The Medical Examiner Service states it holds no records and has no knowledge of either patient.

In short: States coroners hold office under the Crown and are not subject to the Freedom of Information Act's access regime.

In short: States no system records were found for either individual and directs pre-2002 Cardiff and Vale cases to the Glamorgan Archivist.

In short: The archive assistant states only pre-1955 material is available and post-1954 records are not open to external access.

In short: The FOI officer describes further searches of collections and archived systems and reaffirms that no relevant records are held.

In short: Monitoring Officer response declining to progress the complaint under the corporate complaints policy and finding no evidence of a Code of Conduct breach.

In short: States a catalogue search using specified terms produced no results and directs requester to guides and paid search options.

In short: An archives team lists several digitised catalogue entries and images relevant to the enquiry, with further records available by appointment.

In short: The archivist confirms the full date range and catalogue scope were searched, states no restricted material applies, and reiterates that relevant items are held at BT Archives.

In short: The records team states no records were found on its case management system and suggests contacting the Land Registry for further information.

In short: Subject-access response (held privately; content not published).

In short: The FOI officer states no furniture or movable property records from Great House Farm are held, excluding archaeological material.

In short: The archivist details the keywords searched, confirms catalogued and uncatalogued items were checked, and finds no relevant matches apart from unrelated or BT Archives items.

In short: States no further records or destruction documentation exist, confirms searches complete, and notes right to complain to the Information Commissioner.

In short: Provides an attached response document addressing the request for Great House Farm records.

In short: Provides the attached internal review outcome considering the requester's clarification of 20 July 2026.

In short: The archivist reports no records found for the farm, Llandough, Lavernock, or a named individual, and suggests BT Archives and Glamorgan Archives for further research.

In short: The archivist states that searches using the requested keywords returned no relevant results and that Marconi-related files are held at BT Archives.

In short: The archivist details the search methodology, confirms all listed terms were used, and states no relevant records exist or were transferred elsewhere.

In short: The archivist confirms a catalogue search found no records relating to Post Office engineering activities, Marconi's experiments, or related connections.

In short: An archives team reports no results from catalogue and accession-register searches and suggests a local library's Marconi-related books.

In short: An archives team states it holds no Cardiff Post Office or General Post Office records and suggests Glamorgan Archives instead.

In short: The archivist states Glamorgan Archives holds no records of past Post Office employees and suggests contacting the Postal Museum and Archives.

In short: The institution provides a Freedom of Information response with an attached document addressing the request for property-related items.

In short: An archives team states no engineering staff named Williams appear in university calendars for the listed academic years.

In short: States South Wales Police holds no information relating to the request about bailiff attendance, eviction, and related matters.

In short: Confirms photographs relate to a 1988 listing assessment, states no official file survives and records were likely destroyed.

In short: The council states relevant planning records are publicly available via its register and that further archaeological records are not held, suggesting another body.

In short: Provides the internal review outcome letter responding to the earlier review request.

In short: States the Ministry of Justice does not hold the requested court proceeding records and suggests the County Court as a discretionary pointer.

In short: The institution provides specific archival references for deeds and estate leases, noting a possible place-name match and suggesting an in-person visit for further records.

In short: Identifies two planning applications relevant to the site and directs to the online planning register for details.

In short: Library staff report no matching records for the searched terms and suggest contacting Glamorgan Archives for further materials.

In short: Archivist confirms no plans for the farm, provides catalogue references, and directs enquirer to other bodies for related records.

In short: Provides two 1988 survey photographs of the farmhouse and barn along with a written response letter.

In short: The records team supplies accession details for three archives, notes on two others, and offers search room viewing and paid summaries for the rest.

In short: Provides a link to the full archive list and explains how to view titles, dates, and descriptions.

In short: The archives team lists catalogue records relating to sales and estate papers referencing the farm and nearby Llandough estate.

In short: The archivist states no petition record exists for the farm and suggests searching the online catalogue.

In short: Repeats prior archive details, supplies an electronic copy link, and states no correspondence about the site is held.

In short: Confirms 1988 listing assessment rejected the property, provides two photographs, states no further electronic records held, and continues a paper-file search.

In short: The archive identifies a funds ledger covering 1974 Cardiff County Court payments but notes access is restricted due to data protection concerning infants and asks for more case details.

In short: The records team provides specific catalogue references including a court book and Bute estate archive collections, and notes no further index cards exist.

In short: The records team shares the original 1920s manorial return, states it adds little detail, and suggests National Library of Wales catalogues for further research.

In short: The records team explains MDR scope, lists repositories holding Llandough manorial records, and notes review of original 1920s survey returns.

In short: The archive confirms that a record is kept on file noting when withdrawn items were removed and by whom.

In short: The archive explains that original paper catalogues and cards were not retained after digitisation and that withdrawn documents' catalogue descriptions are removed.

In short: Institution states it holds no relevant records, clarifies Manorial Documents Register scope, and redirects to HM Land Registry.

In short: Institution explains it does not annotate disputed records and confirms searched judicial series contain no relevant material.